Today the weird event results got even weirder. Now, not only are the results coming up strange, but also the events I have run today have the wrong prize amounts. Some of that is described as you follow the posts in the link above. Here are a few links to the specific events:
- See first and fifth place prize amounts
See first and fifth place prize amounts
See second and fifth prize amounts
See first prize amount
See first and third prize amounts
See first prize amount
I am sure there are more, but this should give you the idea.
My concern is that there is a glitch when the events run (obviously).
Oh, these are the events also that I evaluated to compare my two horses to the ones that were beating them in competition. Like I said in the thread I refer you to above, I've had about 60 events run for each of the two horses in the last few days, so randomness does not account for why they suddenly turned into perpetual duds a few days ago. Based on tracking competition points, stats, natural stats, age, etc., they should still be beating their competition like they did from ages 5 to 6.
I mention that I changed player bonuses in the thread. I specifically removed Rest-Less, Grace and Glory, and Longevity. I replaced them with Proud and Proper, Speediest, and Better Breeder. When I refer to putting the bonuses back, I am specifically referring to removing Proud and Proper and adding back Grace and Glory. My understanding is that Rest-Less and Longevity do not have any influence on event scores.
The only possibility I can think of at this time is if Rest-Less causes horses to event at higher than 100% energy. When I had Rest-Less, my event trained horses would actually net gain energy each train. After 6 trainings, they'd be at what looked like 130% energy before I turned them and put them in the pasture for their events to run. Could Rest-Less have factored into this?
Oh, yes, I should admit that I have an engineering and statistics background. That's why I waited until so many events had run on the horses before submitting this (Law of Large Numbers - you need at least 30 data points - and preferably more - before you can even think something is a trend instead of randomness). Sorry I am such a geek!