Top Horses in Disciplines Request thread.

[Prancer]

Updated Just a small note to those who choose not to read the original post:
Thoroughbreds will ONLY be put on the Thoroughbred list. This was collectively agreed upon previously so please stop trying to enter them for the racing list (or any oyher list for that matter).

Cowgirl: He's up there again

Kriss P.: Karma Disaster moved up a spot

Great job guys...keep it up.

Whats the point in that when its what they are best at?

[Bandicoot]

Here's another one for dressage... I don't own him, but I trained him.

http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... se=1338644 (currently unnamed) - 26462500

[miss sarabi]

Updated Just a small note to those who choose not to read the original post:
Thoroughbreds will ONLY be put on the Thoroughbred list. This was collectively agreed upon previously so please stop trying to enter them for the racing list (or any oyher list for that matter).

Cowgirl: He's up there again

Kriss P.: Karma Disaster moved up a spot

Great job guys...keep it up.

Whats the point in that when its what they are best at?

This is what was agreed upon when I did the first list. The TB's tend to dominate because they switch their disciplines and continue to do well. As mentioned above this was collectively agreed upon by numerous TB trainers/owners/eventers that it would only be fair to have a seperate TB list.

[miss sarabi]

Updated

[Kacy]

Jumping:
DrM Game Envy

Curtis Shomer


Gaited:
DrM Failure


Endurance:
DrM Rocket's Red Glare

[Prancer]

Updated Just a small note to those who choose not to read the original post:
Thoroughbreds will ONLY be put on the Thoroughbred list. This was collectively agreed upon previously so please stop trying to enter them for the racing list (or any oyher list for that matter).

Cowgirl: He's up there again

Kriss P.: Karma Disaster moved up a spot

Great job guys...keep it up.

Whats the point in that when its what they are best at?

This is what was agreed upon when I did the first list. The TB's tend to dominate because they switch their disciplines and continue to do well. As mentioned above this was collectively agreed upon by numerous TB trainers/owners/eventers that it would only be fair to have a seperate TB list.

Actually, on your other thread, 2 people agreed, and I am pretty sure only one of them does racing.

And on this thread, only one has agreed, and another person has said for tbs that have only done racing, such as my horse, be put on the racing list, since other it will remain empty.

Damian has never done anything other than racing, why should he be put on a list with horses that have done 2/3 things?

[miss sarabi]

PrancerTheAngel:
I will let the other people decide.


I need to know if anybody is for or against allowing racing ONLY evented TB's to be entered on the racing list. Any TB that has done anything other than racing would automatically be removed from the list and any TB that changes disciplines (from racing to jumping for example) would be promtly removed from the list as well. Let me know what you think and if enough people are in favor of allowing racing evented ONLY TB's onto the racing list then I will add them. Your input would be greatly appreciated.

[Prancer]

PrancerTheAngel:
I will let the other people decide.


I need to know if anybody is for or against allowing racing ONLY evented TB's to be entered on the racing list. Any TB that has done anything other than racing would automatically be removed from the list and any TB that changes disciplines (from racing to jumping for example) would be promtly removed from the list as well. Let me know what you think and if enough people are in favor of allowing racing evented ONLY TB's onto the racing list then I will add them. Your input would be greatly appreciated.

I think it should. I mean, its not only mine, theres plenty of renee's horses that are only racing evented.

[Moonshine]

I agree with Prancer. There are quite a few TB's that have been evented in just Racing that I know of. And because TB's can swtich disciplines and win in different ones, the TB's who have dominated in racing and have, say, 20mill or more in winnings will not be able to be on the list because of the ones who won less in Racing, but have switched disciplines multiple times and have over 60mill in earnings.

I myself don't usually change disciplines after eventing, I just roll mine. But none of my racers have enough winnings to be listed.

[Kacy]

I do think it is a good idea to have a seperate TB list, but i do agree the TBs who have evented in only one event should be allowed on the right list...

But you said that the reason why there is a seperate TB list is because of the disc changes... well i evented this mare in Eventing where she won 7 mil, then switched her to HoF where she won 11 mil. But she is not a TB:
http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... rse=983312

So my point is a lot more breeds change disc than TBs.

[Goat]

Updated Just a small note to those who choose not to read the original post:
Thoroughbreds will ONLY be put on the Thoroughbred list. This was collectively agreed upon previously so please stop trying to enter them for the racing list (or any oyher list for that matter).

Cowgirl: He's up there again

Kriss P.: Karma Disaster moved up a spot

Great job guys...keep it up.

Whats the point in that when its what they are best at?

This is what was agreed upon when I did the first list. The TB's tend to dominate because they switch their disciplines and continue to do well. As mentioned above this was collectively agreed upon by numerous TB trainers/owners/eventers that it would only be fair to have a seperate TB list.

Actually, on your other thread, 2 people agreed, and I am pretty sure only one of them does racing.

And on this thread, only one has agreed, and another person has said for tbs that have only done racing, such as my horse, be put on the racing list, since other it will remain empty.

Damian has never done anything other than racing, why should he be put on a list with horses that have done 2/3 things?

i agree.

[evermore]

I think the TB should have their own list because they tend to change disciplines and then have very high winnings BUT I also agree that if a TB has just been trained in racing it should be allowed on the racing list.


As for other breeds changing disciplines that is true but the TB seem to so it most often and/or have extremely high earnings from doing it.

[PaperWings]

=o
mah dressage lady:
http://virtualhorseranch.com/viewhorse. ... se=1112056 at $28,669,630

and my current endurance:
http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... se=1445920 at $ 23,417,500 and is still eventing D:

[Samantha27]

Endurance
http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... %201179150 with $19,797,500**

Halter Conformation
http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... se=1267352 with $54,755,016**

Racing (Sprint)
http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... rse=997718 (He won like 99% of his money in races...the previous owner tried him in western but he did horrible.) with $9,095,750

http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... rse=968509 with $10,304,200 (also switched to western...also failed miserably)

http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... rse=898919 with $20,850,608 won from the old purses (so it should be a lot more, based on today's purse amounts)

Western
http://www.virtualhorseranch.com/viewho ... se=1000001 with $71,439,950

** means that the horse is still competing

[SeventhSanctum]

Your sport one needs updating. I've seen Foxhunting horses win over 100M in Foxhunting alone, which, If I am correct, falls under the "Sport" category also.


And as for some of the western horses, they started in Racing before western, which means they aren't really top horses in western discipline alone, so it wouldn't be fair to say they are top westerners if they havent competed soley in western. And there are many sub-disciplines also.

This will be hard to continue as this is pretty much changing daily.

Just my honest opinion[s].